<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Radiography - Articles in Press</title><description>Radiography RSS feed: Articles in Press.    
 Radiography  is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy.  Radiography  
is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly.  
 
 Radiography  aims to publish 
the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.   </description><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2012 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1078-8174</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2012 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS107881741200003X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817412000028/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001726/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001696/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001684/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001489/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001465/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001416/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001386/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001374/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001325/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000976/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001313/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000964/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000927/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000939/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000903/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000733/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000721/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000629/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817410001446/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817410001136/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS107881741200003X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Leiomyosarcoma of the left atrium. A case study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS107881741200003X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A case of left atrial leiomyosarcoma is reported. A forty year-old woman presented to hospital with a history of shortness of breath and tachycardia. Imaging revealed a left atrial mass which was surgically resected and shown to be a leiomyosarcoma. Adjuvant treatment with external beam radiotherapy was prescribed. The treatment planning was complicated by previous radiotherapy for a left sided primary breast tumour one year previously. Primary cardiac neoplasms are rare, with leiomyosarcoma representing a tiny proportion of these. Limited data is available on the effectiveness of treatment regimes for cardiac leiomyosarcoma due to its rarity. Treatment planning considerations and the strategy adopted for this case are discussed.</description><dc:title>Leiomyosarcoma of the left atrium. A case study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Simon Smith, Stuart Grange, Paula Wilson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2012.01.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CASE REPORT</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817412000028/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Diagnostic radiography: A study in distancing - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817412000028/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Aims: This article aims to explore the ways in which diagnostic radiographers use distancing as a tool for emotional management in radiography practice.Methods: This review utilises data from oral history interviews undertaken as part of a larger study documenting the oral history of the diagnostic radiography profession in the United Kingdom as recounted by 24 participants.Results: The results are presented as illustrative of various aspects of the role of the diagnostic radiographer including the initial choice of diagnostic radiography as a profession, the endemic use of particular terminology, the nature of the encounter in diagnostic radiography (including that of sectional imaging) and whether the role is really patient-centred.Conclusions: The article concludes by suggesting that distancing from the patient is mediated by the need for physical touch in order to position the patient for radiography and also makes the suggestion that those opting for diagnostic radiography as a career may do so because they want a profession which is more distanced from the patient and that, even where this is not the case initially, individuals are socialised into adopting the ‘feeling rules’ of the profession. The article concludes by outlining potential areas for further research.</description><dc:title>Diagnostic radiography: A study in distancing - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Pauline J. Reeves, Sola Decker</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2012.01.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-16</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001726/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Is the lateral radiograph necessary for the management of intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001726/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Aims: To investigate if a lateral hip radiograph is always needed in the management of intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate if a radiographer could accurately identify cases in which the lateral radiograph is not required.Methods: All patients who underwent surgical management of an intra-capsular proximal femoral fracture over a 3 month period at our unit were identified. Radiographs were reviewed by 6 observers: 2 consultant orthopaedic surgeons, 2 registrars, and 2 radiographers. Initially the observers viewed the AP radiographs alone and classified the fractures into displaced, undisplaced, or unclear categories. They were then shown the lateral view and asked for a diagnosis and management plan. Comparison of diagnosis and management based on AP views alone, and AP in-combination with a lateral view was made.Results: 90 patients were included; the mean age was 80.8 years with a range of 42–100 years. 73 underwent arthroplasty and 17 had internal fixation. All observers, including the radiographer were able to make a surgical decision in 90% of the cases based on AP views alone. Lateral radiographs improved the diagnostic accuracy by 6%. The availability of the lateral view did not alter the management in patients where the AP clearly demonstrated a displaced fracture.Conclusion: Elderly patients with a displaced intra-capsular fracture identifiable on the AP do not require a lateral radiograph. Such patients can be accurately identified by the radiographer. Patient discomfort experienced during positioning for the lateral view would be avoided, and a financial saving made.</description><dc:title>Is the lateral radiograph necessary for the management of intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Muhammad Tawfiq Korim, Venthurla Ram Mohan Reddy, David Gibbs, Clare Wildin</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.12.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-10</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001696/abstract?rss=yes"><title>3D tangential wedge pair radiotherapy planning versus 3D forward planned IMRT for breasts in the reduction of hot spots and cardiac doses. (A feasibility study) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001696/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of Breast Cancer and thus far wedged Tangential pairs (WTP) is accepted as the gold standard. However due to greater knowledge of side effects, an interest for increased homogeneity and protection of the Heart has increased. Step and shoot IMRT (S&amp;S) is thought to be the key to this.Purpose: To compare 3D WTP against S&amp;S plans for Breast Radiotherapy.Method: For a feasibility study, analysis was carried out on five CT Breast data sets. The data was copied and anonymised and were retrospectively planned, firstly by WTP, and secondly by S&amp;S. The two techniques were compared via Dose Volume Histograms (DVH).Results: When comparing V95 averages the TWP gave 97.4% coverage versus 96.2% for S&amp;S, For V105, V110 and V115 volumes were recorded as18%, 5%, and 0.2% respectively for TWP, and 7% V105, and 0% V110 and V115 for S&amp;S. Comparison of OAR doses revealed, on average Lung V20, V5 and Heart V13 of 4.6%, 7.6% and 1.18% respectively for TWP and. 4.2% (V20), 7.4% (V5) and 0.08% for Heart V13 for S&amp;S.Conclusions: For V95 and hot spots the S&amp;S planning method proved more consistent and did not yield extra dose to the lungs. In both of the planning methods the Heart received dose reduction lower than anticipated. Partially this is envisaged to be due to contouring issues and the inclusion of OARs in the defined fields. The small sample size may have also contributed to these lower than expected reductions, nevertheless any method which offers a reduction, however small, should be offered.</description><dc:title>3D tangential wedge pair radiotherapy planning versus 3D forward planned IMRT for breasts in the reduction of hot spots and cardiac doses. (A feasibility study) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>R. Rowse</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.12.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001684/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Flouroscopically–guided transhepatic puncture for difficult TIPS re-do procedures utilizing the En Snare retrieval device: A new approach to occluded TIPS in patients with recurrent ascites - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001684/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding are complications due to cirrhosis. Transjugular Intraphepatic Portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure is a well-established treatment for recurrent ascites and variceal bleeding related to portal hypertension. After a TIPS has been placed, the potential of TIPS occlusion or stenosis is high. A TIPS redo procedure has been used in treatment of progressive clinical symptoms. The standard approach is via the jugular route to recannulate the TIPS shunt. Rarely, it cannot be performed from the jugular approach. Therefore, a fluoroscopically -guided transhepatic approach has been devised for these difficult situations. This case describes the use of the transhepatic route through an indwelling Viatorr covered stent utilizing an En-Snare device to help complete the TIPS redo procedure. With this newer approach to TIPS redo procedures, endovascular specialists can achieve TIPS patency despite difficult venous anatomical challenges and the various types of available TIPS stents presently on the market.</description><dc:title>Flouroscopically–guided transhepatic puncture for difficult TIPS re-do procedures utilizing the En Snare retrieval device: A new approach to occluded TIPS in patients with recurrent ascites - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Glenn W. Stambo, Matthew H. Berlet</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.12.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>TECHNICAL NOTE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001489/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The effect of B-mode diagnostic ultrasound exposure on rabbit foetal bone mineral density (BMD) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001489/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Aim: To investigate the changes in rabbit foetal body composition in terms of bone mineral density (BMD) after ultrasound exposure (insonation) was given during different stages of gestation at different lengths of exposure time.Methods: Three groups of pregnant rabbits; A, B, and C were given an ultrasound exposure of 30, 60 and 90min, respectively; during “Trimester 1”, “Trimester 2”, and “Trimester 3”, using a 2-D B-mode Philips HD3 ultrasound system with a 9MHz 50mm broadband high-resolution linear array transducer. A fourth group of pregnant rabbits, O, was used as control. Each full-term newborn rabbits were scanned using a Lunar DPX-IQ dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanner for whole-body BMD measurement in grams per centimetre square (g/cm2).Results: The results suggested that insonation for 90min in the 1st and 2nd trimester produced significant increase in BMD of rabbit foetus.Conclusion: This in-vivo study revealed that a 90min B-mode diagnostic ultrasound exposure during the 1st and the 2nd trimesters caused significant increase in foetal BMD. A further study should be instituted to determine whether this finding in rabbit may also occur in human by means of clinical trials.</description><dc:title>The effect of B-mode diagnostic ultrasound exposure on rabbit foetal bone mineral density (BMD) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Sulaiman M. Dom, Md. Saion Salikin, Hamzah Fansuri Hassan, Nadzri Mohd Yusoff</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.11.011</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-23</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001465/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A UK-wide analysis of trait emotional intelligence within the radiography profession - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001465/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aim of this study was to profile the Trait emotional intelligence (EI) of the radiography profession, explore any differences between subgroups, compare the profession with a normative group and investigate the relationship between EI and the leaders of the profession. An online UK-wide survey was conducted using the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire, a self-report measure. Three main analyses were undertaken to investigate any differences between the sample and population, the radiographer subgroups and the sample and a normative group. The sample had similar characteristics to the population. There were differences between types of radiographer, with nuclear medicine radiographers scoring consistently lower than other groups. There were differences between the leaders and other members of the profession particularly in the Sociability factor. Radiographers scored higher than the TEIQue normative group for Global EI and three of the four factors. The study has benchmarked the Trait EI of one healthcare profession and identified areas for future research to develop our understanding of emotional intelligence.</description><dc:title>A UK-wide analysis of trait emotional intelligence within the radiography profession - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>S.J. Mackay, P. Hogg, G. Cooke, R.D. Baker, T. Dawkes</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.11.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-16</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001416/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Digital teaching library (DTL) development for radiography education - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001416/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Purpose: Having access to a library of radiological images in the university setting is important for teaching and learning in diagnostic radiography. Modern modalities such as PETCT create data volumes rather than single static 2D images. A PACS repository of images alone does not constitute a teaching library without some text based searchable index. A review of several options for acquiring a digital teaching library (DTL) of such indexed DICOM data is presented.Discussion: The data protection principles, current guidance and potential methods for migrating and cleansing large quantities of DICOM data from a clinical PACS prior to transfer to a university setting is discussed. The chosen method is described and the important enabling technology identified. Various methods of index construction are outlined and a method of migrating and cleansing HL7 data from a clinical RIS described.Results: Three terabytes of de-normalised DICOM image files were cleansed of patient, staff and geographic identifiers, within the header tags and pixel data. These files were then migrated to an educational PACS hosted at a university. A searchable index database was created based on 90,200 reports and associated data, and 886,263 DICOM headers to enable meaningful results to be found from the 51,304 unique patient specific cases.Conclusion: A large DTL in the university setting using PACS technology is becoming a valuable resource for teaching, learning and assessment.</description><dc:title>Digital teaching library (DTL) development for radiography education - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Philip Cosson, Neil Willis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.11.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-12</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001386/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis and Osteitis (SAPHO) and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO): Role of imaging in diagnosis - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001386/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: There is a spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders which can be associated with dermatologic findings, the fundamental component of which is a nonbacterial osteitis. CRMO (Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis) and SAPHO syndrome (Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis and Osteitis) describe paediatric and adult conditions, respectively, of inflammatory osteitis that can be associated with palmoplantar pustulosis and acne. Imaging findings are similar and a key component to the diagnosis in both conditions. This report describes two patients with strikingly similar radiologic presentations of clavicular osteitis in whom the diagnosis was made predominantly on the basis of imaging findings. The typical imaging features and radiographic hallmarks of both conditions will also be discussed.</description><dc:title>Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis and Osteitis (SAPHO) and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO): Role of imaging in diagnosis - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Uma Thakur, Marcia Blacksin, Kathleen Beebe, J.C. Neilson, Barry Dashefsky, Gino Tagoylo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.11.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CASE REPORT</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001374/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Citation analysis as a measure of article quality, journal influence and individual researcher performance - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001374/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The research-related performance of universities, as well as that of individual researchers, is increasingly evaluated through the use of objective measures, or metrics, which seek to support or in some cases even replace more traditional methods of peer review. In particular there is a growing awareness in research communities, government organisations and funding bodies around the concept of using evaluation metrics to analyse research citations. The tools available for ‘citation analysis’ are many and varied, enabling a quantification of scientific quality, academic impact and prestige. However there is increasing concern regarding the potential misuse of such tools, which have limitations in certain research disciplines.This article uses ‘real world’ examples from radiography research and scholarship to illustrate the range of currently available citation analysis tools. It explores the academic debate surrounding their strengths and limitations, and identifies the potential impact of citation analysis on the radiography research community.The article concludes that citation analysis is a valuable tool for researchers to use for personal reflection and research planning, yet there are inherent dangers if it is used inappropriately. Whilst citation analysis can give objective information regarding an individual, research group, journal or higher education institution, it should not be used as a total substitute for traditional qualitative review and peer assessment.</description><dc:title>Citation analysis as a measure of article quality, journal influence and individual researcher performance - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Julie M. Nightingale, Gill Marshall</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.044</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-28</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-28</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001325/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Bash bash bash – It almost fits perfectly now. College of radiographers 39th Welbeck memorial lecture radiography - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001325/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This paper outlines The College of Radiographers 39th Welbeck Memorial Eponymous Lecture presented at United Kingdom Radiological Congress in 2010. The presentation considered the future of radiography practice and how that future might be influenced. The presentation was structured into 4 sections: approaches to predicting the future; use of imaging techniques and technologies; 2025 - our future; a roadmap to our future. With an emphasis on the business sector the first section considers traditional and creative ways of predicting the future; some examples of predicting the future are taken from radiography. Using specific examples from radiographic practice the second section attempts to determine whether imaging technologies and radiography techniques are optimised and whether clinical decision making is based upon research evidence. In this section consideration is also given to the temporal relationship between the introduction of new equipment, the research that supports its use and the skills required to work with it. The third section is short and it contains general predictions about what 2025 may look like. The final section proposes briefly how the radiographic profession might move forward into the future we would wish to exist.</description><dc:title>Bash bash bash – It almost fits perfectly now. College of radiographers 39th Welbeck memorial lecture radiography - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Peter Hogg</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.039</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-18</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000976/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Demographics of new Undergraduate Medical Imaging and Medical Sonography degree students at CQUniversity, Australia - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000976/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Aim: To report the student demographics of the inaugural intake into the Bachelor of Medical Imaging and Bachelor of Medical Sonography/Graduate Diploma of Medical Sonography at CQUniversity, Mackay, Australia.Method: Surveys were distributed to students enrolled in the course MEDI11001 Fundamentals of the Imaging Professions; this course is common to both cohorts in Term 1 of the programs. All students enrolled at the time of the survey were present to participate in the survey. Participation was voluntary. Descriptive statistics were developed from responses and thematic analysis applied to open-ended questions.Results: A total of 44 students were enrolled in the programs. The most common place of residence on enrolment was within 40km of the Mackay campus (16/36.4%); mature age students (30/68.2%); live on campus in the purpose built residences (18/40.9%) and were influenced by the location of the programs in Mackay to enrol (27/61.2%), with the primary justification for this being that the programs were offered close to home. The university website was identified as the primary source of information regarding the programs (15/34.1%) followed by family and friends (11/25%). The programs were first preference for 31 students (70.5%). The majority (23/52.3%) undertakes some type of paid work.Conclusion: Both programs have attracted a diverse student cohort. The majority of students were mature age students from outside of the area local to the Mackay campus of CQUniversity.</description><dc:title>Demographics of new Undergraduate Medical Imaging and Medical Sonography degree students at CQUniversity, Australia - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Kelly M. Spuur, Caroline L. Falconi, Cynthia M. Cowling, Anita L. Bowman, Maria A. Maroney</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-17</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001313/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Radiographer led supplementary anterior cruciate ligament MRI sequences: Technical report - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411001313/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Aims: To compare different supplementary MRI sequences of the ACL to arthroscopy and determine the diagnostic performance of each sequence. To ascertain whether radiographers could identify patients requiring supplementary MRI sequences of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, without a supervising radiologist.Methods: The study had ethical approval and two hundred and thirty one consecutive prospective MRI patients with mechanical knee symptoms (77 females, 154 males, of mean age 43.5, range 18–82 years) gave written informed consent. They then had a knee arthroscopy within seven days of the MRI. This was a pragmatic study to see if the six general MRI radiographers, each with over four years experience, could evaluate the ACL on routine orthogonal sequences (sagittal T1, Gradient Echo T2, Coronal STIR and axial fat suppressed dual echo). If they identified no ACL, then two 3D volume sequences (Dual Echo Steady State and Fast Low Angle Shot) and 2D limited sagittal oblique T1 sequences were also performed. Patients requiring extra sequences, missed by the radiographers, were recalled. The MRI sequences were independently evaluated in a blinded fashion by two consultant radiologists and a specialist radiology registrar and compared to the subsequent knee arthroscopy, as the gold standard, to determine the diagnostic performance statistics.Results: The cohort was on the knee arthroscopy weighting list and comprised 205 patients with chronic, 20 acute and 6 acute on chronic mechanical knee symptoms. There were no posterior cruciate, medial, or lateral collateral ligament tears at arthroscopy, used as the gold standard. The arthroscopy was normal and the radiographers correctly did not scan the extra sequence in 140 patients (72%) who then had normal arthroscopies. The radiographers did perform additional ACL sequences in 63 patients (27%). Of these, 10 patients had a partial and 12 complete ACL tears. Only two patients (0.9%) were recalled for additional sequences by the radiologist, and one ACL was normal and one had a full thickness tear at arthroscopy. The ACL evaluation for complete tears and a normal ACL on the volume sequences had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97% and accuracy of 97%, excluding partial tears. Volume sequences including partial tears, had specificities and accuracies over 94%, with substantial interobserver agreement (Kappa 0.86, 95% CI 0.71–1.0). The limited oblique T1 sequence had sensitivities and negative predictive value of over 90%, but low specificity and positive predictive values and slight interobserver reliability (Kappa 0.42, 95% CI 0.2–0.6).Conclusions: Firstly, we have shown pragmatically that experienced radiographers identified almost all cases requiring supplementary MRI ACL sequences, without over scanning or needing supervision. Secondly, either volume sequence (DESS or FLASH) could be used as the supplementary sequence, to evaluate the ACL, but a limited oblique T1 sequence of the intercondylar notch cannot be recommended.</description><dc:title>Radiographer led supplementary anterior cruciate ligament MRI sequences: Technical report - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Paula J. Richards, Iain McCall, Alexandra Kraus, Mary Jones, Gayle Walley, Kathryn Gibson, Nicola Maffulli</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.038</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>TECHNICAL NOTE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000964/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Children’s experience of going through an acute radiographic examination - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000964/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Children’s experience of radiographic examinations remains largely unexplored, although most radiographers examine children on a daily basis. In order to provide the high quality care that meets the needs of patients it was considered important to undertake research focused upon the patients’ experience of radiographic practice.The aim of the study was to investigate children’s experiences undergoing a radiographic examination for a suspected fracture.Inclusion criteria were Swedish-speaking children between 3 and 15 years of age who were submitted for a radiographic examination with an acute condition of the upper or lower extremity. Patients were informed of the study and together with the escorting parent or relative asked for consent to participate.During the examination the child was videotaped and immediately after, the child was interviewed in a nearby facility. The interview contained open-ended questions and was conducted while watching the videotape together with the child and their parent or relative and the researcher.Qualitative content analysis was used in analyzing the collected data. The analysis resulted in two categories – “feeling uncomfortable” and “feeling confident”. The subcategories contained in these categories were “pain in relation to injury and examination”, “the waiting time is strenuous”, “worries for the future and consequences of the injury”, “confidence in parental presence”, “confidence in radiographic staff and examination procedure”, and finally “recognition entails familiarity”.The results revealed that for the younger children, the experience of undergoing an acute radiographic examination was associated with pain and anxiety, but for the older children, the anxiety was more connected to whether the injury had caused a fracture and any anticipated future consequences or complications.</description><dc:title>Children’s experience of going through an acute radiographic examination - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>B. Björkman, L. Almqvist, B. Sigstedt, K. Enskär</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-04</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000927/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Eponyms in imaging of the upper limb: A historical review - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000927/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This paper provides an initial debate on the use of eponyms used in trauma imaging. This is followed by a review of common and interesting eponyms associated with upper limb trauma. The origin of these eponyms, which are still used in clinical practice, is often unclear or not actually attributed to the originator of the fracture type. Trauma eponyms are considered within this paper from the distal to the proximal aspect of the upper limb. A brief biography of famous eponymous surgeons gives insight and background to their work and professional achievements. Each fracture is then described briefly, supported by the relevant image and a concise summary of a radiological report. Since accuracy and conciseness are essential elements of any medical communication, the use of terms that are well understood further facilitate clarity. For this reason some knowledge of the originator and a full description of the eponymic fracture, plus its etymology, is still an essential part of clinical and radiographic teaching. This paper also argues that the radiographic report should always describe soft tissue and bony injuries with the concise use of standard anatomic radiographic terminology.</description><dc:title>Eponyms in imaging of the upper limb: A historical review - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Frederick Murphy, Heather Gunn</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.09.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000939/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Diagnosis of an unusual case of castelman disease - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000939/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Castleman disease (CD) is a benign angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia usually found in the mediastinum, but the pelvis is rarely affected. Descriptions of the pelvic CD mainly involve computed tomography (CT) features and focal well-defined masses, while descriptions based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns and infiltrating masses are rare.Through a case of a pelvic CD, unusual in its radiological appearance, the authors analyse imaging features as suggested by CT and MRI in order to improve the recognition of this rare disease.</description><dc:title>Diagnosis of an unusual case of castelman disease - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>M. Limeme, H. Amara, H. Zaghouani, D. Bakir, C.H. Kraiem</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.09.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CASE REPORT</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000903/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Ovarian Spigelian hernia: A radiological diagnosis - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000903/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: We describe that case of a 54 year old lady with achondroplasia who presented with ongoing left sided abdominal pain. Ultrasound and abdominal computerized tomography images demonstrated an enlarged left ovary and Fallopian tube trapped between the rectus abdominus and the lateral semilunar line under cover of the external oblique aponeurosis. A left sided salpingoophrectomy with mesh herniorrhaphy was performed and histological analysis confirmed the hernia contents were a hydrosalpinx and normal ovary. This case report presents the unusual radiographic images and intraoperative photographs of an ovarian Speglian hernia.</description><dc:title>Ovarian Spigelian hernia: A radiological diagnosis - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ciaran Scott Hill, Balvinder Chahil, Benjamin Marlow</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.08.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-14</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-14</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CASE REPORT</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000733/abstract?rss=yes"><title>An investigation into the opportunities and barriers to participation in a radiographer comment scheme, in a multi-centre NHS trust - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000733/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Introduction and purpose: Despite the United Kingdom College of Radiographers aspiration that first line reporting or commenting by radiographers be normal practice, radiographers have not as yet embraced these opportunities in clinical practice and the number of radiographer commenting (initial reporting) schemes in operation is currently limited. This study explores radiographer opinion with regard to commenting with the aim of establishing the perceived opportunities and barriers to operating a commenting scheme with respect to trauma radiography.Method: A survey of 79 radiographers working within a single multi-centre Trust in the north of England was undertaken using a questionnaire. Attitudinal statements were used to elicit information on perceived opportunities and barriers to the implementation of radiographer commenting.Results: Fifty three questionnaires were returned within the specified time frame (n-53/79; 67.1%). A number of barriers to implementing a commenting scheme were identified including time, technology, anatomical confidence and training. Opportunities included improving professional profile and increased professional contribution to decision making within the patient pathway. No correlation was demonstrated between respondent demographic and responses suggesting that opinions expressed were not influenced by hospital site, radiographer grade or years experience.Conclusion: Radiographers generally had a positive attitude towards the implementation of radiographer commenting and felt that their operation was both beneficial to patient care and the professional profile of radiographers. However, a number of barriers were identified and while concerns regarding training may be increasingly addressed by the Department of Health’s e-learning image interpretation package, the impact of changes in technology and subsequent service operation have not yet been fully evaluated.</description><dc:title>An investigation into the opportunities and barriers to participation in a radiographer comment scheme, in a multi-centre NHS trust - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Anne Lancaster, Maryann Hardy</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.08.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-09-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-09-07</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000721/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Impact of ancestry and body size on sonographic ulnar nerve dimensions - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000721/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact that geographic ancestry and body size have on ultrasonographic measurements of the ulnar nerve size measured at the elbow.Materials and methods: We performed anthropometric measurements of body size and ultrasonographic measurements of the ulnar nerve at the elbow on 13 Vietnamese and 24 European participants. Regression analysis was used to determine the effect of body size and geographic ancestry on ulnar nerve size.Results: BMI had the greatest impact on ulnar nerve size. The short axis diameter was least resilient, and the long axis diameter was the most resilient to the effects of body size and geographic ancestry.Discussion: The long axis diameter has an apparent immunity to the influences of overall body size, arm size, or geographic ancestry and has the most potential as a sensitive discriminator between normal nerves and nerves affected by ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.</description><dc:title>Impact of ancestry and body size on sonographic ulnar nerve dimensions - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jessie T. Childs, Maureen Phillips, Kerry A. Thoirs</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.08.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000629/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Collaboration between radiological technologists (radiographers) and junior doctors during image interpretation improves the accuracy of diagnostic decisions - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817411000629/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Rationale and Objectives: In Emergency Departments (ED) junior doctors regularly make diagnostic decisions based on radiographic images. This study investigates whether collaboration between junior doctors and radiographers impacts on diagnostic accuracy.Materials and Methods: Research was carried out in the ED of a university teaching hospital and included 10 pairs of participants. Radiographers and junior doctors were shown 42 wrist radiographs and 40 CT Brains and were asked for their level of confidence of the presence or absence of distal radius fractures or fresh intracranial bleeds respectively using ViewDEX software, first working alone and then in pairs. Receiver Operating Characteristic was used to analyze performance. Results were compared using one-way analysis of variance.Results: The results showed statistically significant improvements in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the junior doctors when working with the radiographers for both sets of images (wrist and CT) treated as random readers and cases (p ≤ 0.008 and p ≤ 0.0026 respectively). While the radiographers’ results saw no significant changes, their mean Az values did show an increasing trend when working in collaboration.Conclusion: Improvement in performance of junior doctors following collaboration strongly suggests changes in the potential to improve accuracy of patient diagnosis and therefore patient care. Further training for junior doctors in the interpretation of diagnostic images should also be considered. Decision making of junior doctors was positively impacted on after introducing the opinion of a radiographer. Collaboration exceeds the sum of the parts; the two professions are better together.</description><dc:title>Collaboration between radiological technologists (radiographers) and junior doctors during image interpretation improves the accuracy of diagnostic decisions - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>B.S. Kelly, L.A. Rainford, J. Gray, M.F. McEntee</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2011.06.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-07-15</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-07-15</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817410001446/abstract?rss=yes"><title>WITHDRAWN: Citation analysis as a measure of the impact of research - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817410001446/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause.The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy</description><dc:title>WITHDRAWN: Citation analysis as a measure of the impact of research - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Julie M. Nightingale, Gill Marshall</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2010.11.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-12-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-12-17</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817410001136/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Adverse events caused by MRI contrast agents: Implications for radiographers who inject - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/PIIS1078817410001136/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This article provides a comprehensive literature review regarding side effects both minor and major associated with contrast agent injection. This includes a discussion of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), which remains highly topical. Radiographers now commonly are responsible for injection of contrast agent in patients, in keeping with their extended role. Therefore it is incumbent on them to understand the agents they inject, the contra-indications for injection and any potential associated risks, so that they can act and react accordingly in a timely manner. The need for this knowledge was made very evident after the recent death of a patient from anaphylactic shock when there was a delay in mounting the appropriate procedure. This paper represents a synthesis of relevant articles and reflects on the results, before drawing appropriate conclusions particularly those of special relevance to radiographers.</description><dc:title>Adverse events caused by MRI contrast agents: Implications for radiographers who inject - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Gill Marshall, Chris Kasap</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.radi.2010.09.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Radiography (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-11-08</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Radiography</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-11-08</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>
