Journal Home
Search for

Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 26-39 (February 2010)


View previous. 8 of 17 View next.

A Delphi study on research priorities in radiation therapy: The Australian perspective

Jennifer CoxaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Georgia Halkettbemail address, Claudia Andersonaemail address, Robert Heardaemail address

Received 15 May 2009; received in revised form 30 July 2009; accepted 26 September 2009.

Abstract 

Radiation therapists (RTs) need to engage more in research to establish an evidence base for their daily practice. However, RTs world-wide conduct little research themselves, although positive moves have been made in some countries.

This project is the second stage of a Delphi process aimed at prioritising RT areas of research interest. A questionnaire was constructed using responses to a previous questionnaire which identified the research interests of Australian RTs. Fifty-three Research Areas were identified from these responses and grouped into 12 categories such as “imaging in radiation therapy”, “symptom management”, “accuracy of patient positioning” and “techniques/equipment”. The survey was sent to all Australian departments of radiation oncology, and RTs were asked to form interest groups to discuss and prioritise the Research Areas.

There was a 50% response rate (18 of 36 departments surveyed). The highest ranked research Category was “imaging in radiation therapy”. Six of the top 10 ranked Research Areas were within Central RT practice (“imaging in radiation therapy”; “symptom management”; “accuracy of patient positioning” and “techniques/equipment”) and the other four were within broader RT practice (“diversification, recognition and other professional issues”; and “management and staff issues”). Patient Care was also considered to be an area requiring more research.

This prioritization of Research Areas and categories provides a useful list of future research for RTs, which will enable them to decide whether their research ideas are a high priority, and spend less time deciding on a relevant research topic that needs investigation in their own workplaces.

a Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia

b Western Australia Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care, Curtin University of Technology, Health Research Campus, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 9351 9060; fax: +61 2 9351 9146.

PII: S1078-8174(09)00091-1

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2009.09.006


View previous. 8 of 17 View next.