Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 327-332 , November 2009

Mean glandular doses for women undergoing mammographic breast screening in Oyo state, Nigeria

  • F.O. Ogundare

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +234 8050397616.
  • ,
  • A.N. Odita

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, University College Hospital, PMB 5116,Ibadan, Nigeria
  • ,
  • R.I. Obed

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
  • ,
  • F.A. Balogun

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Radiation Protection and Research, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Received 17 January 2009 ,Revised 31 March 2009 ,Accepted 17 May 2009.

References 

  1. Ogunseyinde AO, Adeniran SAM, Obed RI, Akinlade BI, Ogundare FO. Comparision of some x-ray examinations with CEC reference doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;98:231–234
  2. Nassivera E, Nardin L. Quality control programme in mammography: second level quality controls. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:612–618
  3. Jamal N, Ng K-H, McLean D. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:238–245
  4. Faulkner K, Broadhead DA, Harrison RM. Patient dosimetry measurement methods. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50:261–269
  5. Rothernberg LN. Patient dose in mammography. Radiographics. 1990;10:739–746
  6. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Carlsson GA. Breast dosimetry. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50:185–203
  7. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) . A guide to mammography and other breast imaging procedures. NCRP Report 149 Bethesda, M: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2004;
  8. Matsumoto M, Inoue S, Honda I, Yamamoto S, Ueguchi T, Ogata Y, et al. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography. Radiol Med. 2003;21(6):280–284
  9. Dance DR. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35:1211–1219
  10. Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker DM. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue in screen-film mammography. Radiology. 1991;179:143–148
  11. Gentry JR, DeWerd LA. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States. Med Phys. 1996;23(6):899–903
  12. Assiamah et al. 2005.
  13. Ogundare FO, Uche CZ, Balogun FA. Radiological parameters and radiation doses of patients undergoing abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine x-ray examinations in three Nigerian hospitals. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:934–940
  14. Ajayi IR, Akinwumiju A. Measurement of entrance surface dose to patients in four common diagnostic examinations by thermoluminescence dosimetry in Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2000;87(3):217–220
  15. Ogundare FO, Oni OM, Balogun FA. Measurements of x-ray absorbed doses to dental patients in two dental x-ray units in Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;102(4):355–358
  16. Ogundare FO, Ademola JA. Scattered doses to different parts of cancer patients during radiotherapy treatment in Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;102(1):71–74
  17. Young KC, Burch A. Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programme in 1997 and 1998. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:278–287
  18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation . Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. sources United Nations sales publication E.00.IX.3. vol. I. New York, NY: UN; 2000;
  19. American College of Radiology (ACR) . Committee on quality assurance in mammography. Mammography quality control manual, medical physicist's section. Reston, VA: ACR; 1999;
  20. Edwards CR, Mountford PJ, Green S, Palethorpe JE, Moloney AJ. The low energy x-ray response of the LiF: Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosimeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:543–547
  21. Chan H, Doi K. Monte Carlo simulation studies of backscatter factors in mammography. Radiology. 1981;139:195–199
  22. Asada Y, Suzuki S, Kobayashi M, Koga S. Development of a program for estimation of patient exposure in mammography. In: Proceedings of the International Radiation Protection Association, Madrid, Spain; 2004.
  23. Young KC, Burch A, Oduko JM. Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programme in 2001 and 2002. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:207–218
  24. Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:801–813
  25. International Atomic Energy Agency . International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. Safety Series no. 115-1 Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 1996;
  26. Burch A, Goodman DA. A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:517–527

PII: S1078-8174(09)00034-0

doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2009.05.002

Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 327-332 , November 2009