Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 292-299 , November 2009

The application of anatomical side markers during abdominal and IVU examinations: An investigation of practice prior to and post-installation of computed radiography (CR)

  • Jane M. Platt

      Affiliations

    • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Ruth M. Strudwick

      Affiliations

    • University Campus Suffolk, Waterfront Building, Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 473 338543.

Received 9 July 2008 ,Revised 10 November 2008 ,Accepted 10 November 2008.

References 

  1. SoR . Statements for professional conduct. London: CoR; 2004;
  2. Health Professions Council . Standards of proficiency – radiographers. London: HPC; 2007;
  3. Ball J, Price T. Chesneys' radiographic imaging. 6th ed.. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995;
  4. Bell G, Finlay D. Basic radiographic positioning and anatomy. London: Baulliére Tindall; 1986;
  5. Swallow R, Naylor E, Roebuck E, Whitley A. Clark's positioning in radiography. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1986;
  6. McQuillen-Martensen K. Radiographic critique. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996;
  7. Unett E, Royle A. Radiographic techniques and image evaluation. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes; 1997;
  8. Dyer O. Surgeon is struck off for failing to mention disciplinary action. BMJ. 2005;330:274
  9. SoR . Radiographer suspended after failure to prove competency. Synergy News. 2007 July;4
  10. SoR . Incompetent radiographer suspended by the HPC. Available from: <http://www.sor.org/members/atwork/news/news2.htm>2007;[accessed 11.11.2007]
  11. Finnbogason T, Bremmer S, Ringertz H. Side markings of the neonatal chest X-ray: two legal cases of pneumothorax side mix up. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:938–941
  12. Brasel K, Layde P, Hargarten S. Evaluation of error in medicine: application of a public health model. Acad Emer Med. 2000;7:1298–1302
  13. Davis M, Reeves P. Maintaining the chain of evidence in child abuse cases. J Diag Rad Imaging. 2004;5(2):61–68
  14. SoR . Radiography – the child and the law: the roles and responsibilities of the radiographer. London: SoR; 2005;
  15. Aakre K, Johnson C. Plain-radiographic image labeling: a process to improve clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(12):949–953
  16. Lau S, Mak AS, Lam W, Chau C, Lau K. Reject analysis: a comparison of conventional film-screen radiography and computed radiography with PACS. Radiography. 2004;10:183–187
  17. Oakley J. Digital imaging – a primer for radiographers, radiologists and health care professionals. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd; 2003;
  18. Godwin R, de Lacey G, Manhire A. Clinical audit in radiology: 100 + recipes. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 1996;
  19. Crombie I, Davies H, Abraham S, Florey C. The audit handbook – improving health care through clinical audit. Chichester: John Wiley; 1993;
  20. Oppenheim A. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter; 1992;
  21. Donabedian A. Reflections on the effectiveness of qua1ity assurance part II. In:  Palmer R,  Donabedian A, Povar  editor. Striving for quality in health care: an inquiry into policy and practice. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1991;p. 59–128
  22. Bowling A. Research methods in health – investigating health and health services. 2nd ed.. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2002;
  23. Schultz K, Whitney D. Measurement theory in action: case studies and exercises. London: Sage; 2005;
  24. Bull A. Audit and research. BMJ. 1993;306:67
  25. CDC . What is Epi Info™?. Available from: <http://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo>2008;[accessed 10.05.08]
  26. UBHT NHS Trust Clinical Audit Department . Clinical audit and effectiveness: how to select an audit sample. Bristol: NHS; 2007;Available from: <http://hospital.blood.co.uk/library/pdf/safe_use/How_to_Select_an_Audit_Sample.pdf>[accessed 18.03.08]
  27. Polit D, Beck C, Hungler B. Essentials of nursing research methods, appraisal and utilization. 5th ed.. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2001;
  28. Hinkle D, Wiersma W, Jurs S. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1998;
  29. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999;
  30. Washington State Legislature . Radiographic standards: WAC 246-808-565. Available from: <http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=246-808-565>1996;[accessed 25.03.08]

PII: S1078-8174(08)00111-9

doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2008.11.006

Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 292-299 , November 2009