Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 106-112, May 2009

An evaluation of current methods of diagnosing colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom

  • Janet Bond

      Affiliations

    • Band 6 Radiographer, X-ray West, Derriford Hospital, Derriford Road, Plymouth PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 34 Trevose Way, Efford, Plymouth, Devon PL3 6PF, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 01752 241679, +44 7976 169051 (mobile).
    • ,
  • Mandy Tuckey

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy, Room 2K06, Glenside Campus, University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol BS16 1DD, United Kingdom
    • Tel.: +44 117328 8509.

Received 11 June 2007; received in revised form 16 October 2008; accepted 22 October 2008.

Abstract 

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly conversed topic, particularly since implementation of screening for CRC is imminent within the U.K.

Aims

The aim of this research project was to examine the diagnostic tools currently used within the UK to detect CRC and their impact on the aetiology and epidemiology of CRC.

Methodology

The complexity of the research topic lent itself towards a literature review. A systematic approach of researching was therefore adopted to analyse and critically evaluate the reliability and validity of articles. Electronic databases including AMED, Cancerlit, CINHAL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and EBM-Reviews were utilised to provide a wide spectrum of recent and relevant articles. Other research strategies involved looking for books relating to the topics, which were kept to within 6 years of publication to maintain accuracy of information. Selected websites, such as NICE, the Department of Health, NHS websites and Cancer Research U.K. were useful at explaining current and future screening plans and trials within Britain and allowed the study of reliable U.K. statistics. The research articles were then outlined and placed into sections of similar topic areas, which enabled the author to compare, contrast and evaluate the hypotheses. By organising the research in this way, a thorough review of the existing research for CRC was resultant.

Results

A range of diagnostic tools is currently in use for detecting CRC within the UK. Screening for asymptomatic individuals aged 55–60 years+, (the age range where CRC incidence is higher), would provide the most effective reduction in CRC incidence and mortality rates.

Conclusions

The use of a multi-phasic screening programme consisting of faecal occult blood tests (FOBt) and a whole bowel examination is considered to be the most effective diagnostic tools. However, preventative schemes, such as better education of the risks and symptoms of CRC, supported by the NHS Cancer Plan (2000), have demonstrated to be a vital adjunct to CRC screening to reduce the incidence and mortality of the disease.

Keywords: Colon, Examination, Aetiology, Epidemiology, Sensitivity, Specificity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(08)00105-3

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2008.10.004

Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 106-112, May 2009

Article Tools