Peer assessment of individual contributions to a group project: Student perceptions

References 

1. Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M. Peer assessment in problem-based learning: a qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2007;12:169–186
2. White F, Lloyd H, Kennedy G, Stewart C. An investigation of undergraduate students' feelings and attitudes towards group work and group assessment. Proceedings of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia; 2005 3–6 July; Sydney, Australia; 2005. p. 616–623.
3. Elliott N, Higgins A. Self and peer assessment – does it make a difference to student group work?. Nurse Education in Practice. 2005;5:40–48
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (190 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Gatfield T. Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1999;24(4):365–377
5. Conway R, Kember D, Sivan A, Wu M. Peer Assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 1993;18(1):45–56
6. Ohland MW, Layton RA, Loughry ML, Yuhasz AG. Effects of behavioral anchors on peer evaluation reliability. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005 Jul;94(3):319–326
7. Bormann Young C, Henquinet JA. A conceptual framework for designing group projects. Journal of Education for Business. 2000;76(1):56–61
8. Mello JA. Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings. Journal of Management Education. 1993;17(2):253–259
9. Cantwell RH, Andrews B. Cognitive and psychological factors underlying secondary school students’ feelings towards group work. Educational Psychology. 2002;22(1):75–91
10. Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: the causes of the consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:822–832
    • CrossRef
11. Korshaven S. Group projects: loafing and striving. The Teaching Professor. 1994(April);8(4):4
12. Shepperd JA, Taylor KM. Social loafing and expectancy-value theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999;25(9):1147–1158
    • CrossRef
13. McArdle G, Clements KD, Hutchinson-Lendi K. The free rider and cooperative learning groups: perspectives from faculty members. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference; 2005 Feb 24–27, 2005; Estes Park, CO; 2005. p. 529–35.
14. Hare A. Group size. The American Behavourist Scientist. 1981;24(5):695–708
15. Henry P. Making groups work in the classroom. Nurse Educator. 2006;31(1):26–30
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
16. Kerr N, Bruun S. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(1):78–94
    • CrossRef
17. Falchikov N. Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International. 1995;32:175–187
18. Weaver R, Cotrell HW. Peer evaluation: a case study. Innovative Higher Education. 1986;11:25–39
19. Brooks CM, Ammons JL. Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business. 2003;78(5):268–272
20. Daly JP, Worrell DL. Structuring group projects as miniature organizations. Journal of Management Education. 1993;17(2):236–242
21. Lejk M, Wyvill M. The effect of the inclusion of self assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2001;26(6):551–561
22. Dochy F, Segers M, Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher Education. 1999;24(3):331–350
23. Lejk M, Wyvill M. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2001;26(1):61–72
24. Reilly RR, Smither JW, Vasilopoulos NL. A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psychology. 1996;49(3):599–612
25. Violato C, Lockyer J. Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2006;11(3):235–244
26. Falchikov N, Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research. 2000;70(3):287–322