Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 6-11, February 2009

Influence of femoral rotation on femoral offset determined from radiographs

  • Carl Meyer

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author Information10 South Hermitage, Shrewsbury, SY3 7JR, UK. Tel.: +44 1743 340 850.

James Cook Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

Received 14 August 2007; received in revised form 20 December 2007; accepted 21 December 2007.

Abstract 

To study how the size of femoral offset, judged from radiographs, depends on the femur's degree of internal–external rotation during radiography, this report studied 108 hips (55 right, 53 left; 60 male, 48 female).

For each hip, the femoral offset was determined from radiographs taken with the femur in 15 degrees of internal rotation (standardised femoral offset), and also from radiographs taken when no special attempt was made to have the femur in this position (control femoral offset – corrected for magnification).

Control femoral offset (corrected) was less than the standardised femoral offset in 102 of 108 hips. On average, for the 108 hips as a group, control femoral offset (corrected for magnification) was 7.7 (CI 8.7, 6.6) mm smaller than standardised offset, a significant difference (p<0.0001, t-test, two-tailed). For individual hips, the difference was as great as 25mm.

Depending on the femoral rotation during radiography, calculating femoral offset from x-rays may underestimate the femoral offsets sufficiently to compromise hip joint replacement in clinical orthopaedic practice.

Keywords: Femoral offset, Rotation, Hip replacement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(08)00008-4

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2007.12.002

Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 6-11, February 2009