Radiography
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 312-317, November 2008

Intraprostatic fiducials for image guidance: Workflow implications in a single linac department

  • Mark Middleton

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Queensland, St. Andrews Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 7 46903822; fax: +61 7 4690 3843.
    • Work undertaken whilst at Ballarat-Austin Radiation Oncology Centre.
  • ,
  • Andrew See

      Affiliations

    • Austin Health, Ballarat-Austin Radiation Oncology Centre, Ballarat, Australia
  • ,
  • Aldo Rolfo

      Affiliations

    • Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    • Work undertaken whilst at Austin Health.
  • ,
  • Steve Medwell

      Affiliations

    • Austin Health, Ballarat-Austin Radiation Oncology Centre, Ballarat, Australia
  • ,
  • Michael Lim Joon

      Affiliations

    • Austin Health, Ballarat-Austin Radiation Oncology Centre, Ballarat, Australia
  • ,
  • Daryl Lim Joon

      Affiliations

    • Austin Health, Ballarat-Austin Radiation Oncology Centre, Ballarat, Australia
  • ,
  • Jarad Martin

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Queensland, St. Andrews Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia
  • ,
  • Vincent Khoo

      Affiliations

    • Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK

Received 17 July 2007; received in revised form 8 November 2007; accepted 21 November 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

To assess the accuracy and implications on workflow of an online correction electronic portal imaging (EPI) protocol utilising bony anatomy in the online environment and an assessment of three implanted gold seed fiducial markers in the offline environment. This paper summarises an initial trial to establish the range of systematic and random errors present in patient set-up for both bony anatomy and fiducial markers, and to calculate optimal clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins. The impact of the introduction of such a technique was also assessed in terms of impact on workflow and resource management in a single machine unit (SMU).

Methods and materials

Pre treatment electronic portal images (EPIs) were acquired and bony anatomy was matched with CT derived digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). Intervention in field placement was made if field placement fell outside the range of 4mm on any of the orthogonal axes. In the offline environment the position of the implanted gold seed fiducials was aligned with that of the DRRs. An analysis of set-up error, total error and internal organ motion was then undertaken, with full statistical analysis of systematic and random errors.

Results

Eleven patients completed treatment as specified, with 1006 EPIs available for analysis. Treatment times were in the order of 10.4min. Set-up errors were in the order of 2.7mm right–left, 2.4mm sup–inf and 1.6mm ant–pst. These were reduced to 1.2mm, 0.7mm and 0.9mm respectively utilising an online correction protocol. However there was minimal impact on total error and internal organ motion. Using the data obtained in both the online and offline environments optimal CTV–PTV margins were calculated for correcting to bone, correcting to gold seed fiducials and also the possibility of EPI malfunction.

Conclusions

Daily targeting of the prostate is both technically feasible and can be carried out in an efficient and accurate manner. An online correction protocol using gold seeds as the matching mechanism provides the ability to significantly reduce treatment margins for most prostate patients, and importantly does not impact on a busy clinical workflow.

Keywords: Implanted gold seed fiducials, Electronic portal imaging, Online corrections, Workflow, Efficiency

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(07)00102-2

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2007.11.002

Radiography
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 312-317, November 2008