Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 49-57, February 2009

A comparison of fluoroscopy time and dose area product (DAP) readings for outpatient barium enema examinations

  • Hollie Ruffles

      Affiliations

    • The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, UK
  • ,
  • Ruth M. Strudwick

      Affiliations

    • Radiography, Faculty of Health Wellbeing and Science, University Campus Suffolk, Rope Walk, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 LT, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1473 296693.

Received 20 August 2007; received in revised form 5 November 2007; accepted 17 November 2007.

Abstract 

Historically, the radiologist was the operator for the barium enema examination. However, as a result of the worldwide shortage of radiologists, and the development of the four-tier service delivery model, radiographers at this Trust have undertaken postgraduate training, and now perform and report their own barium enema examinations. Periodic clinical audit is required to ensure that the patient receives the same high standard of care, in terms of radiation dose, irrespective of the health care professional undertaking the examination. This study seeks to assess the situation at this large hospital in East Anglia. Fluoroscopy time and dose area product (DAP) measurements from 92 barium enema examinations, performed by radiographers (90.2%) and radiologists (9.8%), were compared to see if there were significant differences in the radiation dose to the patient, as a result of the operator group undertaking the examination. The study shows that although radiographers produce more undercouch images (a mean of 12.1 images compared to 9.3 images), their fluoroscopy times (a mean of 1.74min compared with 2.82min) and undercouch DAP readings (a mean of 1244.9cGycm2 compared with 1971.3cGycm2) were lower than that of the radiologists. This resulted in a lower total DAP (a mean of 1536.8cGycm2 compared with 2236.0cGycm2), and therefore a lower radiation dose to the patient, when the examination was undertaken by a radiographer, as opposed to a radiologist. The researchers believe that this study highlights the ability of the radiographer to assume the role of the operator for the barium enema examination. Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that continued assessment is required to ensure that performance is maintained.

Keywords: Double contrast barium enema, Advanced practitioner, GI radiographer, Radiation dose, DAP meter readings, Audit, DRL

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(07)00101-0

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2007.11.001

Radiography
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 49-57, February 2009