Radiography
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 282-287, November 2008

Observer variation in vascular CT measurements of the abdominal aorta

  • Andrew England

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom
    • Department of Medical Imaging & Radiotherapy, University of Liverpool, Johnson Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Medical Imaging & Radiotherapy, University of Liverpool, Johnson Building Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 151 794 5123; fax: +44 151 795719.
    • Tel.: +44 161 291 6200; fax: +44 161 291 6201.
  • ,
  • John S. Butterfield

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Raymond J. Ashleigh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom

Received 21 March 2007; received in revised form 27 September 2007; accepted 11 October 2007.

Abstract 

Aim

To assess the inter-observer variation between a radiographer and radiologist when performing CT measurement of the abdominal aorta before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods

A total of 30 consecutive patients who were considered anatomically suitable for EVAR had aortic measurements performed independently by a vascular radioogist and then by a radiographer training vascular and CT imaging. All measurements were performed on a computer workstation using electronic callipers, each patient had 12 anatomical sites evaluated (eight diameters, four vessel lengths). Statistical analysis was performed by the computer package SPSS for Windows 11.01.

Results

Of the 30 patients, mean difference in measurements between observers was 2.3mm±1.2mm and 6.0mm±6.4mm for diameter and vessel length measurements, respectively. Two hundred and seven (86%) diameter measurements were ≤2mm of each other and 233 (97%) were within ≤5mm. Eighty-two (57%) length measurements were within ≤5mm, and 100 (83%) within 10mm or less. Widest variation existed for measurements of common iliac diameter and aortic neck length, where coefficients of variance were 38.2 (95% CI 35.7–41.0) and 40.0 (95% CI 36.2–44.6), respectively.

Conclusion

A good level of agreement exists between a trained radiographer and radiologist when comparing vascular CT measurements of the aorta. It is technically feasible for a radiographer to perform these measurements, and improvements in variability may be achieved from a more standardised technique and automated vessel analysis software. Further research is required to establish the overall variability between different observer types when undertaking vascular CT measurements.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Computed tomography, Quantification, Observer variation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(07)00094-6

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2007.10.002

Radiography
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 282-287, November 2008