Radiography
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 318-322, November 2008

Professional knowledge and interprofessional practice

  • Peter C. Milburn

      Affiliations

    • Canterbury Christ Church University, Undergraduate Interprofessional Studies, North Holmes Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 1QU, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 01634 894400.
  • ,
  • Hazel Colyer

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health & Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 1QU, UK

Received 21 January 2007; received in revised form 4 September 2007; accepted 12 September 2007.

Abstract 

Interprofessional education (IPE) is well-established in the professional discipline of radiography and other health and social care professions, driven by central government policies promoting interprofessional, collaborative working. The development of an appropriate knowledge base for interprofessional work is therefore important and, as a starting point, the article investigates the concept and significance of professional knowledge as a means to unravel and shed light on the potential emergence of a new body of knowledge, ‘interprofessional knowledge’. The paper discusses whether the term ‘interprofessional knowledge’ (IPK) is meaningful and its utility for interprofessional practice, arguing that such knowledge is located within the discourse of interprofessional learning and practice. As such it is fluid and contextualised. The implications of this for all health and social care professionals, including radiographers, are elaborated to assist in future curriculum development and enhance understanding of the knowledge that underpins effective, collaborative, interprofessional practice. The paper concludes by suggesting there are a number of key implications for professional practice namely, IPE cannot teach interprofessional knowledge, rather it should facilitate interprofessional practice, through which such knowledge is construed, and person-centred care can be more effectively achieved. Second, interprofessional practice is highly contextualised by practice setting and point of service delivery. Any attempt to decontextualise it for the purpose of curriculum development would be illogical; interprofessional knowledge is in a symbiotic relationship with its prior professional knowledge. Third, the organisation of IPE would be better driven by alliances of complementary professions in order to maximise its potential effectiveness and credibility with practitioners.

Keywords: Professional knowledge, Interprofessional practice, Interprofessional learning, Health and social care education

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(07)00088-0

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2007.09.003

Radiography
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 318-322, November 2008