Radiographer abnormality detection schemes in the trauma environment—An assessment of current practice

References 

1. Berman L, deLacey G, Twomey E, Twomey B, Welch T, Eban R. Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers. BMJ. 1985;290:421–422
   • CrossRef
2. Price R. Radiographer reporting: origins, demise and revival of plain film reporting. Radiography. 2001;7:105–117
3. Rudd P. The development of radiographer reporting 1965–1999. Radiography. 2003;9:7–12
4. Paterson AM. Role development–towards 2000: a survey of role developments in radiography. London: College of Radiographers; 1995;
5. Price RC, Le Masurier SB. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: a new perspective. Radiography. 2007;13(1):18–29
6. College of Radiographers . Medical image interpretation & clinical reporting by non-radiologists: the role of the radiographer. London: College of Radiographers; 2006;
7. Health Professions Council . Standards for proficiency: radiographers. London: Health Professions Council; 2003;
8. Quality Assurance Agency. Benchmark statements: Radiography 2001 (online), http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/health/radio.pdf (accessed 3 January 2007).
9. Hardy M, Snaith B. Developing and implementing radiographer comments schemes: issues for consideration. Synergy. 2005;11:5–9
10. Hardy M, Culpan G., Accident and emergency radiography: a comparison of radiographer commenting and ‘red dotting’. Radiography 13(1):65–71.
11. Brealey S, Scally A, Hahn S, Thomas N, Godfrey C, Crane S. Accuracy of radiographers red dot or triage of accident and emergency radiographs in clinical practice: a systematic review. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:604–615
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (264 KB)
    • CrossRef
12. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative & quantitative approaches. London: SAGE Publications; 1994;p. 119
13. Denscombe M. The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1998;6
14. British Association of Emergency Medicine. BAEM directory (online), http://www.baemdirectory.com (accessed 13 January 2007).
15. Hardy M, Barrett C. Interpretation of trauma radiographs by radiographers and nurses in the UK: a comparative study. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:657–661
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
16. Benger JR, Lyburn ID. What is the effect of reporting all emergency department radiographs?. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:40–43
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Tachakra S, Stinson A. Suitable cases for teleconsultation by ENPs. Emerg Nurse. 2001;8(8):9–11
    • MEDLINE
18. Brown V. Hard to soft copy reporting: a reporting radiographer's viewpoint. Synergy. 2006;6:24–26
19. Gant D. ‘Red Dot’ styles on PACS. Society of Radiographers discussion forum (online), http://www.sor.org/members/forum/viewtopic.php?t=594 (accessed 28 September 2006).
20. Dimond B. Red dots and radiographers’ liability. Health Care Risk Rep. 2000;10–12
21. Edwards J, Bowman S. The expanding role of the radiographer. Radiologic Sci Educ. 1995;2(1):15–21
22. Hampshire MJ. Current perception of red dot systems: is red dot an expected role for graduate radiographers and is training available to support it? MSc thesis, University of Bradford, Bradford, 2007.
23. Snaith BA. Are Trusts replacing the red dot?. Br J Radiol (UKRC supplement). 2004;46–47
24. Loughran CF. Reporting of fracture radiographs by radiographers: the impact of a training programme. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:945–950
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
25. McConnell JR, Webster AJ. Improving radiographer highlighting of trauma films in accident and emergency departments with a short course of study – an evaluation. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:608–612
    • MEDLINE
26. Hargreaves J, Mackay S. The accuracy of the red dot system: can it improve with training?. Radiography. 2003;9(4):283–289