Radiography
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 45-59, February 2006

Irreversible compression in digital radiology. A literature review

  • Euclid Seeram

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging, British Columbia Institute of Technology, 3700 Willingdon Avenue, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5G 3H2
    • INSITE Consultancy Inc, 14564 18A Avenue White Rock, British Columbia, Canada V4A 8A4
    • Corresponding Author InformationMedical Imaging, British Columbia Institute of Technology, 3700 Willingdon Avenue, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5G 3H2.

Received 4 February 2005; accepted 8 April 2005.

Abstract 

The purpose of this literature review was to explore the research conducted to date on the use of irreversible compression in digital diagnostic radiology.

The degree of research on the use of irreversible compression in digital radiology is still in its infancy, since the technologies for digital radiology are still evolving. However, 90 papers reviewed address research examining the use of various compression ratios on image quality and observer performance on several detection tasks such as identifying structures and lesion detection, on chest, CT, skeletal, angiography, mammography, MRI, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, and teleradiology images.

In general the results of these studies show that image types in digital radiology are different based on their mode of generation, as well as their spatial and contrast resolution, determined by their matrix size/pixel size, and bit depth, respectively. Furthermore, there are several forms of irreversible compression algorithms, and they are not all equal in terms of performance. Additionally, of the three evaluation methods used to measure observer performance on compressed images, the ROC methodology is most commonly used.

Some types of images such as digitized chest images, CT, MRI and ultrasound images have different “compression tolerance” and therefore a single compression ratio cannot be assigned to a modality, even for a given organ system. Chest images for example can be compressed at ratios as high as 10:1–20:1 using CR and DR without compromising image quality. Other image types such as CT images for example, can be compressed at ratios as high as 20:1 in the detection of coronary artery calcification. The results of these studies would appear to indicate that image compression in digital radiology would have to be optimized based on the types of images being generated, interpreted for primary diagnosis, stored, and transmitted to remote sites for clinical review by physicians other than radiologists.

Keywords: Digital image, Digital image compression, Irreversible compression, Research, Evaluation methods

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(05)00057-X

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2005.04.002

Radiography
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 45-59, February 2006