Radiography
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 26-30, February 2006

Videofluoroscopic assessment of dysphagia: A questionnaire survey of protocols, roles and responsibilities of radiology and speech and language therapy personnel

  • Maxine Power

      Affiliations

    • Section of Gastrointestinal Science, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Manchester, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Section of Gastrointestinal Science, University of Manchester, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK. Tel.: +44 161 787 4422; fax: +44 161 787 4364.
  • ,
  • Hans-Ulrich Laasch

      Affiliations

    • Academic Department of GI-Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • Ram S. Kasthuri

      Affiliations

    • Academic Department of GI-Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • David A. Nicholson

      Affiliations

    • Radiology, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • Shaheen Hamdy

      Affiliations

    • Section of Gastrointestinal Science, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Manchester, UK

Received 25 August 2004; accepted 8 March 2005.

Abstract 

Videofluoroscopy (VF) is the ‘gold standard’ assessment for oropharyngeal dysphagia and radiographers are beginning to direct this examination independently, yet little is known about the roles and responsibilities of the core professions of radiology and speech and language therapy and their practice in this examination.

Aim

To evaluate VF practice and identify the roles and responsibilities of radiology and speech and language therapy personnel.

Materials and methods

A questionnaire was developed and distributed to speech and language therapists (SALT) and radiologists via national special interest networks. Information regarding protocols, test materials, supervision, radiation protection and training was obtained.

Results

One hundred and thirteen questionnaires were completed, 83% of respondents had more than 5 years service. Most were carrying out VF on an ‘ad hoc’ basis with only 32% participating in more than 6 assessments per month. There was no consensus on protocol and 41% chose to thicken barium solutions by adding more barium sulphate powder, potentially predisposing patients to complications. Over 50% of SALTs had received one day post-graduate training in VF, whereas, only one radiologist had specific VF training.

Conclusion

Despite its importance in determining the feeding route for patients, VF is carried out infrequently by most clinicians and protocols vary widely. Moreover, intra- and inter-disciplinary training and supervision is minimal. More work is needed to develop standard guidelines, to improve the quality of the examination and its reproducibility.

Keywords: Barium, Deglutition, Radiation protection, Protocols, Swallowing, Competency

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-8174(05)00024-6

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2005.03.003

Radiography
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 26-30, February 2006