Image quality of digital mammography images produced using wet and dry laser imaging systems

References 

1. Gunn C. Radiographic imaging: a practical approach. 3rd ed.. Churchill Livingston; 2002;p. 18–9
2. Bogucki TM, Wojcik TJ, Paul WE, Haus A. Printing systems for medical imaging. Technical and scientific monograph No. 7. Eastman Kodak Company; 1998;p. 1–43
3. Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyhara J, Kato H. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology. 1983;148:833–838
   • MEDLINE
4. Habbal F, Cargill EB, Schuh D, Ferla G. New digital hardcopy system for medical diagnostics. Proc SPIE. 1993;1897:204–214
5. Krupinski EA. Clinical assessment of dry laser-processed film versus traditional wet-processed film with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 1996;3:855–858
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (389 KB)
   • CrossRef
6. Zahriger M, Wassmer G, Kurg B, Winnekendonk G, Gossmann A, Lackner KJ. Image quality of digital chest X-ray wet versus dry laser printer. Digital Imaging. 2001;314:158–162
7. Gahleitner A, Kreuzer S, Schick S, Nowotny R, Breitenseher M, Solar P, et al. Dry versus conventional laser imagers: film properties and image quality. Radiology. 1999;210:871–875
   • MEDLINE
8. Okabe T, Nakamura K, Asano T. Image quality of dry-processed film. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2001;66:75–80
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (329 KB)
   • CrossRef
9. Fatouros PF, Skubic S. The development of realistically-shaped, tissue equivalent phantom for assessing the mammographic process. Radiology. 1985;157P:32
10. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic images. EUR 16260 EN, Luxembourg; 1996.
11. <http://www.gemedicalsystemseurope.com/euen/rad/xr/education/dig_xray_iq.html/>
12. Scobbie E, Dabill DW, Groves JA. Chemical pollutants in X-ray film processing departments. Ann Occup Hyg. 1996;4:423–435
13. Teschke K, Chow Y, Brauer M, Chessor E, Hirtle B, Kennedy SM, et al. Exposure and their determinants in radiographic film processing. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Jan–Feb;63(1):11–21
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef